Specialist geotechnical engineering consultancy

Stronger ground, lighter footprint.

GES supports engineering firms, infrastructure owners and agencies when the ground is the difficult part of the project: expansive and weak soils, ground improvement decisions, and investigations into distress.

Led by a Professional Engineer licensed in Texas. Available for assignments in the U.S. and internationally.

Illustrative soil profile A schematic boring log showing fill over expansive fat clay, silty sand and weathered shale, with arrows marking swell in the clay layer. 0 ft5101520 FillMixed clay and gravel Fat clay (CH)High plasticity; swellsand shrinks with moisture Silty sand (SM)Medium dense Weathered shaleSulfate testing advised
Schematic only. A profile typical of many heaving slabs and cracked pavements.

Dr. Bhaskar Chittoori, Ph.D., P.E. (Texas), ENV SP, F.ASCE, is the founder and principal of GES. He leads every engagement personally and reviews every deliverable before it is issued, drawing on geotechnical design practice and more than a decade as principal investigator on funded work for state transportation departments, federal agencies and industry.

About Dr. Chittoori

What we do

Seven services in three groups, each listed with a typical client need and what we deliver. Life-cycle and carbon assessment is available as a supporting specialty on any of them.

Soils, ground improvement and geosynthetics

  • Expansive and problematic soils

    NeedHeave, shrinkage or sulfate risk on a site with reactive soils.

    DeliverableSoil behavior assessment with heave estimates and a treatment-alternatives assessment.

  • Ground improvement and pavement subgrades

    NeedChoosing, specifying and verifying a treatment for weak or reactive subgrades.

    DeliverableTreatment-alternatives assessment, specification and testing program.

  • Geosynthetics applications and design reviews

    NeedKnowing whether a geocell, geogrid or geotextile solution suits the site.

    DeliverableApplication assessment or design review memorandum.

Investigation and review

  • Forensic investigation

    NeedA slab, pavement, foundation or wall has cracked, heaved or settled, and the cause is unclear.

    DeliverableForensic findings report with remedial alternatives.

  • Independent peer review

    NeedA specialist second read before a geotechnical report, design or specification is relied on.

    DeliverableTechnical review memorandum.

Research and training

Supporting specialty: life-cycle and carbon assessment. Treatment alternatives compared on carbon, energy and life-cycle cost, prepared by an Envision Sustainability Professional. More on life-cycle assessment

Why work with GES

Difficult ground rewards depth, independence and clear evidence.

Depth on difficult soils

Our principal has spent more than 20 years in geotechnical research and practice, with more than 100 publications and about $4.5 million in funded research behind the advice.

Independent advice

GES does not sell construction products or contracting services. Any commercial relationship relevant to an assignment is disclosed before work begins.

Sustainability you can measure

Where it matters to the client, we quantify the carbon and cost of each option, so a lower-impact choice is a defensible one.

Selected experience

Work by our principal at previous institutions and employers, before GES was founded. Outcomes are as reported in the published record.

Idaho Transportation DepartmentUS-95, Elephant Butte, western IdahoPrincipal investigator, Boise State University, 2015–2016
Problem
Recurrent heave kept damaging a highway pavement over expansive clay. Earlier lime stabilization and moisture barriers had given only partial relief.
Contribution
Led laboratory characterization and swell estimates, then numerical modeling of alternative geosynthetic-reinforced pavement sections.
Application
The study placed the most expansive clay at least 6 ft below the pavement, beyond the reach of shallow chemical treatment. Modeling showed geocells to be the most effective option for reducing differential heave. ITD's reconstruction, completed in 2019, placed geocells over the existing lime-treated base.

Sources: forensic study, Transportation Research Record (2018) · ITD project summary

Montana Department of TransportationStatewide stabilization guidancePrincipal investigator, Boise State University; final report 2020
Problem
MDT needed protocols for deciding when and how to chemically stabilize problematic soils, including soils containing soluble sulfates.
Contribution
Led laboratory evaluation of lime and cement treatment on six Montana soils of different geology, with life-cycle cost comparison against MDT's current practice.
Application
Stabilization design protocols were delivered as a final report and technical manual. Treatment was viable for all six soils in the short term, but only three performed satisfactorily for long-term use, showing why mineralogy, moisture and curing must drive additive selection.

Sources: final report FHWA/MT-20-002/9389-522/FR · technical manual

Tarrant Regional Water DistrictEagle Mountain Dam, Fort Worth, TexasEngineer II, Parsons Brinckerhoff, 2009–2010
Problem
The water district commissioned a comprehensive seepage and stability assessment of the two 1930s hydraulic fill dams that impound Eagle Mountain Lake, to bring an aging dam up to current design standards.
Contribution
Seepage, settlement and stability analysis as part of the Parsons Brinckerhoff team, organizing field and laboratory data and building seepage and slope stability models.
Application
The assessment was followed by rehabilitation of the spillway dam, completed in 2013 with a grouting program to reduce seepage and new instrumentation. The project received the ASDSO National Rehabilitation Project of the Year award in 2014.

Sources: TRWD award announcement · Renewable Energy World (2015)

See all experience

Start with a free scope discussion

Tell us briefly about the site and the question you need answered. We'll arrange an initial conversation, at no charge, to understand the problem and confirm whether, and how, we can help. Technical findings and recommendations follow once an engagement is agreed.

You don't need to send project files to get in touch. Relevant reports, logs and data can be shared after first contact.